4.8 Article

Large-Area Laminar TEA2MnI4 Single-Crystal Scintillator for X-ray Imaging with Impressive High Resolution

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 14, 期 42, 页码 47913-47921

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c14582

关键词

metal halides; single-crystal scintillator; X-ray absorption capacity; radioluminescence; X-ray imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2001214]
  2. NSF of Guangdong Province [2019B1515120050]
  3. GDUPS [2016]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M693602]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A single crystal scintillator, TEA2MnI4, with high transmittance and light yield has been successfully prepared using a local-heating solvent evaporation method. It shows potential for high-resolution X-ray imaging.
Current X-ray imaging scintillators are dominated by inorganic scintillators grown through a high-temperature process. Exploring new types of scintillators with mild growth conditions, high light yields, and eco-friendly chemical compositions is essential and challenging. Herein, the zero-dimensional large-area laminar organic-inorganic hybrid metal halide TEA2MnI4 (TEA = tetraethylammonium) single crystal with dimensions of 50 mm x 60 mm x 0.82 mm is grown via a local-heating solvent evaporation method. Compared with its Cl-and Br-based counterparts, the incorporation of the iodine component enhances the X-ray attenuation ability and significantly accelerates the decay of the photoluminescence of TEA2MnI4. Interestingly, the prepared TEA2MnI4 exhibits a high transmittance of >90% over the range of 515-765 nm and exhibits a high light yield of 26288 photons/MeV, which provides the prerequisite for high-resolution X-ray imaging. The TEA2MnI4 single-crystal scintillator displays an astonishing spatial resolution exceeding 25 line pairs per millimeter, which provides a design concept for a Mn-I-based single crystal for high-performance scintillator applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据