4.8 Article

F-doping-Enhanced Carrier Transport in the SnO2/Perovskite Interface for High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 14, 期 37, 页码 42093-42101

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c11390

关键词

F-doping; tin oxide; interfacial passivation; open-circuit voltage; perovskite solar cells; stability

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700702]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB258400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402118, 61674063, 62074061]
  4. Foundation of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20210324142010030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the addition of NH4F to the SnO2 electron transport layer improved the interface defect density, charge extraction, and energy-level arrangement. The optimized SnO2 films resulted in a significant improvement in the open-circuit voltage and champion efficiency of perovskite solar cells. Additionally, the F-doped SnO2 perovskite solar cells exhibited enhanced thermal and humidity stability.
SnO2 is widely used as the electron transport layer (ETL) in n-i-p perovskite solar cells. However, the deep-level defects at the interface between SnO2 and the perovskite film will lead to energy loss, reducing the open-circuit voltage. Therefore, the interface optimization is essential to raise the efficiency and enhance the stability of perovskite solar cells. In this work, we introduce NH4F into the SnO(2 )electron transport layers, and the optimized SnO2 films reduce the interface defect density, improve the charge extraction, and reveal a better energy-level arrangement. Compared to the conventional SnO2 perovskite solar cell, the average V-oc is improved by 70 mV with the champion efficiency up to 22.12%. Moreover, the unencapsulated F-doped SnO2 perovskite solar cells show better thermal stability (maintained 86.2%) and humidity stability (maintained 80.8%) after 35 days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据