4.7 Article

Cebpα is essential for the embryonic myeloid progenitor and neutrophil maintenance in zebrafish

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 593-600

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.09.001

关键词

Cebp alpha; Embryonic myelopoiesis; Development; Zebrafish

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271564, 31229003, 31271574]
  2. Team Program of Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2014A030312002]
  3. Research Grants Council of the HKSAR [663212, HKUST5/CRF/12R, AoE/M-09/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vertebrates, myeloid cells arise from multiple waves of development: the first or embryonic wave of myelopoiesis initiates early from non-hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) precursors and gives rise to myeloid cells transiently during early development; whereas the second or adult wave of myelopoiesis emerges later from HSCs and produces myeloid cells continually during fetal and adult life. In the past decades, a great deal has been learnt about the development of myeloid cells from adult myelopoiesis, yet the genetic network governing embryonic myelopoiesis remains poorly defined. In this report, we present an in vivo study to delineate the role of Cebp alpha during zebrafish embryonic myelopoiesis. We show that embryonic myelopoiesis in cebpa-deficient zebrafish mutants initiates properly but fails to produce macrophages and neutrophils. The lack of macrophages and neutrophils in the mutants is largely attributed to the cell cycle arrest of embryonic myeloid progenitors, resulting in the impairment of their maintenance and subsequent differentiation. We further show that Cebp alpha, perhaps acting cooperatively with Runx1, plays a critical role in embryonic neutrophil maintenance. Our findings reveal a new role of Cebp alpha in embryonic myelopoiesis. Copyright (C) 2016, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Genetics Society of China. Published by Elsevier Limited and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据