4.8 Article

Highly Connected Silicon-Copper Alloy Mixture Nanotubes as High-Rate and Durable Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 524-531

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504014

关键词

silicon nanowires; highly connected nanotubes; lithium-ion batteries; alloys

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK20130573]
  2. 333 Project of Jiangsu Province [BRA 2015284]
  3. National Basic Research 973 Program [2014CB921101, 2013CB932900, 2013CB632101]
  4. NSFC [11274155, 61204050]
  5. Scientific and Technological Support Programme in Jiangsu province [BE2014147-2]
  6. Jiangsu Shuangchuang Personal and Team's Program
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seeking high-capacity, high-rate, and durable anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has been a crucial aspect to promote the use of electric vehicles and other portable electronics. Here, a novel alloy-forming approach to convert amorphous Si (a-Si)-coated copper oxide (CuO) core-shell nanowires (NWs) into hollow and highly interconnected Si-Cu alloy (mixture) nanotubes is reported. Upon a simple H-2 annealing, the CuO cores are reduced and diffused out to alloy with the a-Si shell, producing highly interconnected hollow Si-Cu alloy nanotubes, which can serve as high-capacity and self-conductive anode structures with robust mechanical support. A high specific capacity of 1010 mAh g(-1) (or 780 mAh g(-1)) has been achieved after 1000 cycles at 3.4 A g(-1) (or 20 A g(-1)), with a capacity retention rate of approximate to 84% (approximate to 88%), without the use of any binder or conductive agent. Remarkably, they can survive an extremely fast charging rate at 70 A g(-1) for 35 runs (corresponding to one full cycle in 30 s) and recover 88% capacity. This novel alloy-nanotube structure could represent an ideal candidate to fulfill the true potential of Si-loaded LIB applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据