3.8 Article

Changes in the pattern and disease burden of acute respiratory viral infections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

出版社

KOREA DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION AGENCY
DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0144

关键词

Cost of illness; COVID-19; Population surveillance; Respiratory infections

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a comparative analysis of the incidence of different respiratory viruses before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed a significant decrease in the number of reported cases for most respiratory viral infections during the pandemic, along with reductions in medical service usage and expenditures.
Objectives: We conducted a comparative analysis of the differences in the incidence of 8 acute respiratory viruses and the changes in their patterns before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Three sentinel surveillance systems of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service were analyzed. The average numbers of reported cases and the related hospital admissions and outpatient data were compared between April 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. Changes in the disease burden and medical expenditures between these 2 time periods were evaluated. Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of reported cases of all acute respiratory viral infections, except for human bocavirus, decreased significantly. Data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service also showed decreases in the actual amount of medical service usage and a marked reduction in medical expenditures. Conclusion: Non-pharmacological interventions in response to COVID-19 showed preventive effects on the transmission of other respiratory viruses, as well as COVID-19. Although COVID-19 had a tremendous impact on society as a whole, with high social costs, there were also positive effects, such as a reduction in the incidence of acute respiratory viral infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据