Is the future of peer review automated?

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!

Lonni Besançom et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Letter Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility?

Tracey Weissgerber et al.

NATURE MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?

Vedrana Pavlovic et al.

Summary: Citations are crucial in scientific papers, but inaccuracies are common, with the most frequent problems being citation of non-existent findings and incorrect interpretation of results. Involving authors in verifying citation accuracy and proposing actions to reduce inaccuracies are potential solutions to this issue.

CLINICAL SCIENCE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?

Stylianos Serghiou et al.

Summary: The study introduces an automated approach to identify indicators of transparency in scientific research and applies it on a large scale of biomedical literature, showing significant improvements in some aspects of transparency. It also maps transparency across various fields, countries, journals, and publishers.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medical Laboratory Technology

Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019

Mario Malicki et al.

Summary: The study found that about 69% of comments on bioRxiv preprints were posted by non-authors, while 31% were posted by the preprints' authors themselves. Non-author comments included traditional full review reports, as well as praise, suggestions, or criticisms. Author comments mainly consisted of publication status updates, additional study information, or solicited feedback for the preprints.

BIOCHEMIA MEDICA (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The article introduces PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

PLOS MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Reporting ethical approval in health and social science articles: an audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislation

Kjell Asplund et al.

Summary: The reporting of research ethics approval is reasonably good, but not strict, in health science articles, while failure to report ethical approval is about three times more frequent in social sciences compared to health sciences. Improved adherence to ethical regulations seems to be particularly needed in observational studies, articles with few authors, and social science research.

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self-correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction

Colby J. Vorland et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods

Joe Menke et al.

ISCIENCE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis

Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al.

LANCET (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Semi-automated fact-checking of nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical research publications: The Seek & Blastn tool

Cyril Labbe et al.

PLOS ONE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research

David Blanco et al.

BMJ OPEN (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biology

Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints

Richard J. Abdill et al.

ELIFE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications

S. P. J. M. Horbach et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)

Kaitlyn Hair et al.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature

Halil Kilicoglu et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biology

Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests of ANOVA'

Tracey L. Weissgerber et al.

ELIFE (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Review Ethics

The changing forms and expectations of peer review

S. P. J. M. (Serge) Horbach et al.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Review Oncology

Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research

A. Carmona-Bayonas et al.

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update

Yanling Jin et al.

JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author's perspective

Janine Huisman et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study

Agnes Dechartres et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study

Agnes Dechartres et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Psychology, Social

The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology

Nicholas J. L. Brown et al.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Psychology, Mathematical

The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013)

Michele B. Nuijten et al.

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials

Jigisha Patel

BMC MEDICINE (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

Bias in peer review

Carole J. Lee et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies

Gerben ter Riet et al.

PLOS ONE (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials

Kenneth F. Schulz et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Article Information Science & Library Science

CrossCheck: an effective tool for detecting plagiarism

Helen (Yuehong) Zhang

LEARNED PUBLISHING (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Is the future of peer review automated?

相关参考文献

导出引文

分享论文