3.8 Article

Turning the world back to earth (and back again) through Alessandro Sciarroni's spinning practice

期刊

JOURNAL OF DANCE & SOMATIC PRACTICES
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 75-90

出版社

INTELLECT LTD
DOI: 10.1386/jdsp_00070_1

关键词

embodied practice; material knowledge; ?earth vs; world?; eco-performance; somatic experience; paradoxical body

类别

资金

  1. national funds through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P. [UIDB/00279/2020, UIDP/00279/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores Alessandro Sciarroni's spinning practice taught at the Na Pratica summer school in Portugal and its impact on individuals. Drawing on personal experience, the author analyzes the relationship between somatic practices and knowledge reproduction, as well as the potential of spinning practice to shift human attitudes towards the planet.
In this article, I address Alessandro Sciarroni's spinning practice as it was taught and perceived in the context of the choreographer's workshop at the 2019 Na Pratica summer school in Portugal. Drawing on my personal involvement as a participant, I begin by evoking my embodied experience to outline and character-ize the different impressions raised by the spinning exercises. Therefore, exploring a possible understanding of my body-in-action within the experimental rationale that framed the workshop. I then take a closer look at the practice under Martin Heidegger's conceptual dichotomy of 'earth vs. world' insofar as it provides a systematic scale of relational possibilities between our bodies, ourselves as individ-uals and our surrounding environment. Hence, contributing to the overall debate around the relation between somatic practices and knowledge reproduction. I build on this reflection by further exploring the potential that spinning practice has in stimulating new understandings of 'being in the earth', thus raising the great conversation about the urgency of human beings to 'turn' their attitude towards the planet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据