3.8 Article

DELIVERING THE UNDELIVERABLE: TEACHING ENGLISH IN A UNIVERSITY TODAY

期刊

ENGLISH
卷 71, 期 273, 页码 140-160

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/english/efac006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the challenges and issues of teaching English in UK universities, where there has been a decline in humanities enrolments and changes to the school curriculum. It discusses the difficulty of making a case for the value of English education in today's educational context, which focuses on technology and measurable outcomes. However, it argues that the skills cultivated in literary study, such as close reading, can help students navigate the complexities of the digitized, online world.
In UK universities, English has seen a steep fall in admissions, in the context of a general decline in humanities enrolments and changes to the school curriculum which have turned students away from the subject. This article explores what teaching English in a university means in these difficult times. It asks: what actually happens in an English class? What do students learn? And why is it so hard to make the case for English, to find a form of words in today's educational vocabulary that will convince sceptics of its value? The subject's declining status is part of a more general sense that technological change and the free market have answered all the key questions about what skills we need to learn and how we should live our lives. We frame the delivery of teaching in terms suggested by technology and the market - as a frictionless process with a predictable and measurable outcome. This does not sit well with the untidily human, stochastic, accretive nature of humanities teaching. And yet the skills of close reading cultivated in literary study can teach students to plot a course through contemporary life. They can help them to navigate a digitized, online, data-driven world whose meanings and values are filtered through unexamined words and unacknowledged stories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据