3.8 Article

EFFICACY OF AN ONLINE BRIEF PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION DURING LOCKDOWN ON COVID-19

期刊

REVISTA DE PSICOTERAPIA
卷 33, 期 122, 页码 173-193

出版社

REVISTA PSIQUIATRIA & PSICOLOGIA HUMANISTA, S L
DOI: 10.33898/rdp.v33i122.1141

关键词

COVID-19; effectiveness; telepsychology; online psychological intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of online psychological intervention during the COVID-19 health alert and measure user satisfaction and perceived effectiveness. The results demonstrate a significant decrease in initial symptoms, improvement in coping strategies and resilience, and high satisfaction among users.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the online psychological intervention offered to users by the Applied Psychology Service during the health alert period decreed by COVID-19. In addition, we quantified the satisfaction and effectiveness perceived by the user after the intervention. Sixty adults (70.4% female) with an average age of 41.49 years were included. The instruments used pre-and post-intervention were the abbreviated versions of the Symptom Checklist (SA-45), the Clinical Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), the Coping Inventory (COPE-28) and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISK). The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) and the Perceived Intervention were completed after the end of the intervention. This intervention was designed with the objectives of decreasing initial symptomatology through psychoeducation and brief regulation exercises to enhance positive coping strategies and resilience. The results showed a significant decrease (p <.05) in the initial symptomatology on all the dimensions analyzed and a significant improvement on the coping strategies and resilience. A high overall score was observed in the users' satisfaction and perceived efficacy. In conclusion, our results point to a high efficacy of an online brief psychological intervention in a lockdown context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据