3.8 Article

Building peace through tourism: The analysis of an ongoing Siachen Glacier dispute between India and Pakistan

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLITICS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 836-848

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20578911221118730

关键词

conflict; India; peace; peace park; Siachen Glacier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article aims to analyze the effectiveness of converting the Siachen Glacier into a peace park on India-Pakistan relations, as well as investigating how the peace park can build mutual understanding for cooperation and peace. The proposal of the Siachen Peace Park offers a solution to diffuse tensions between the military establishments of India and Pakistan, as soldiers from both nations are currently losing their lives due to extreme climate conditions. The article presents a four-stage peace park conversion model to explain the potential outcomes of this Peace Park for both countries.
The current article aims to analyse the effectiveness of the conversion of the Siachen Glacier into a peace park on India-Pakistan relations. It further investigates how the peace park can build mutual understanding leading to cooperation and peace between the two countries. The article presents the conceptual framework for adequate supervision of the Siachen Glacier jointly by India and Pakistan to mitigate the existing tensions and conflicts through tourism within the context of the tourism-peace nexus and peace park concept. The Siachen Peace Park proposition offers an amazing way out for the policymakers to diffuse tensions between the military establishments of India and Pakistan. Both the nations have been losing the lives of their soldiers among the snow-capped peaks not due to any gunfight but mainly because of climatic extremities and frostbite. The suggestion of the Siachen Peace Park has been explicated with the help of a four-stage peace park conversion model conceived by the authors, which gives a conceptual understanding of the outcomes of this Peace Park for both countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据