4.4 Article

Alternative Antimicrobial Commercial Egg Washing Procedures

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
卷 79, 期 7, 页码 1216-1220

出版社

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-423

关键词

Chlorine; Chlorine stabilizer; Eggs; Egg wash; Salmonella

资金

  1. Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations
  2. SmartWash Solutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial table eggs are washed prior to packaging. Standard wash procedures use an alkaline pH and warm water. If a cool water method could be developed that would still provide a microbiologically safe egg, the industry may save energy costs associated with water heating. Four wash procedures were evaluated for Salmonella reduction: pH 11 at 48.9 degrees C (industry standard), pH 11 at ambient temperature (similar to 20 degrees C), pH 6 at 48.9 degrees C, and pH 6 at ambient temperature. Alkaline washes contained potassium hydroxide-based detergent, while pH 6 washes contained approximately 200 ppm of chlorine and a proprietary chlorine stabilizer (T-128). When eggs were inoculated by immersion in a cell suspension of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium, all treatments resulted in a slight and similar reduction of Salmonella numbers (approximately 0.77 log CFU/ ml of shell emulsion reduction). When eggs were inoculated by droplet on the shell surface, Salmonella counts were reduced by approximately 5 log CFU when washed with chlorine plus the chlorine stabilizer at both temperatures and with the alkaline wash at the high temperature. The reductions in Salmonella by these treatments were not significantly (P > 0.05) different from each other but were significantly (P < 0.05) more than the reduction observed for the 20 degrees C alkaline treatment and 20 degrees C control water treatments. Ambient temperature acidic washes reduced Salmonella contamination to the same degree as the standard pH 11 warm water wash and may be a viable option to reduce cost, increase shelf life, and slow pathogen growth in and on shell eggs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据