4.4 Article

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF HEAT TREATMENT AND SONICATION ON THE QUALITY OF BARBERRY (BERBERIS VULGARIS) JUICE

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12956

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Barberry (Berberis vulgaris) is an indigenous Iranian plant which its fruit is mainly consumed as fresh, dried and also used for juice production. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of thermal treatment and different sonication conditions on the characteristics of barberry juice. Additionally, the effect of both treatments on degradation kinetics of anthocyanins during refrigerated storage (at 4C) was also evaluated. Sonication and thermal treatments significantly (P< 0.05) reduced microbial counts. A significant increase in the total phenol content and antioxidant activity in all the sonicated juice samples was observed while the thermal treatment had adverse effect on these parameters. Sonication (especially in 70% amplitude) showed less effect on total anthocyanin and color of barberry juice compared to thermal treatment. The degradation kinetics of anthocyanins in all juice samples during refrigerated storage followed first-order kinetics. Half-life (t(1/2)) of anthocyanins was much shorter in thermal treatment sample (64.90 days) comparing with sonication samples (111.33-158.58 days). PRACTICAL APPLICATION In recent years, emerging non-thermal techniques, such as sonication, for inactivating microorganisms and improving the health related compounds and other quality parameters of fruit juices have been developed in food industry. Barberry (Berberis vulgaris) is a new source of anthocyanins and antioxidant compounds which can be used as natural pigments in the industry. In this study the effects of thermal pasteurization and sonication on microbial growth and some important quality parameters of barberry juice were compared. The information obtained in our study will be useful for successful application of sonication treatment of barberry juice for preserving the quality of this product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据