期刊
LEARNED PUBLISHING
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 674-677出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1484
关键词
Peer review; Publication; Writing
The article emphasizes that reviewer comments are helpful in improving article quality, but many authors have negative attitudes towards reviewer comments, finding them unclear, inappropriate, and unpleasant. The article also highlights the characteristics that reviewers should possess when conducting reviews, such as being brief, quick, clear, specific, and only requesting feasible tasks within a short period of time.
Key points More often than authors would like, submitted manuscripts are returned to them for further revision. Most authors recognize that reviewer comments do help to improve articles, but many find reviewer comments unclear, inappropriate, unpleasant, and often frankly irritating. Reviewers should not review articles if they know they are incompetent or have strong opinions about the methodology or hypothesis. Reviewers should be brief, quick, clear, specific, and only ask what is feasible in a short period of time. Asking for full literature reviews, multiple additional references, and research background is often impossible given journal requirements for brevity.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据