4.3 Article

Conscious, Complacent, Fearful: Agri-Food Tech's Market-Making Public Imaginaries

期刊

SCIENCE AS CULTURE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 58-82

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2090914

关键词

Agri-food tech; imaginaries of the public; consumer acceptance; solutionism; scientism; technofix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tech sector sees the food system as an important area for innovation, but innovators in the agri-food tech domain struggle with concerns about public acceptance. They must also secure investor support and market demand. To address these challenges, innovators draw on three different consumer imaginaries, each aligning with a specific problem-solving approach. These imaginaries aim to resolve potential consumer acceptance issues for investors without engaging with the actual public.
While the tech sector has seized upon the food system as an area in which it can have a major impact, innovators within the agri-food tech domain are dogged by concerns about public acceptance of technologies that may be controversial or simply not of interest. At the same time, because they operate within an investor-dependent political economy, they must demonstrate that the public will consume the products they are creating. To both secure markets and legitimate their approaches to problem-solving, entrepreneurial innovators draw on three existing imaginaries of consumers, each of which articulates with a particular tendency they have pursued in problem-solving. Reflecting a tendency of solutionism, those promoting technologies that promise minimal processing and/or short or traceable supply chains invoke a health- and eco-conscious consumer. In keeping with technofixes, those promoting technologies of mimicry invoke a complacent consumer. Reflecting the tendency toward scientism in problem-solving and related projections of public knowledge deficits, those promoting potentially controversial technologies invoke a fearful consumer and embrace transparency to inform and assure such consumers. By promising future consumers who will willingly accept emerging technologies, each of these imaginaries seeks to resolve - for investors - potential problems of consumer acceptance generated by the particular approaches to problem-solving innovators have adopted. While STS scholars have shown how public-facing engagement exercises and policy work are often limited by deficit-driven imaginaries of the public, in these investor-facing spaces possible objections are both imagined and overcome without any interaction with actual publics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据