Comparison of turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough surfaces up to high Reynolds numbers

Turbulent houndary layer measurements above a smooth wall and sandpaper roughness are presented across a wide range of friction Reynolds numbers, delta(+)(99) and equivalent sand grain roughness Reynolds numbers, k(s)(+) (smooth wall: 2020 <= delta(+)(99) <= 21 430, rough wall: 2890 <= delta(+)(99) <= 29 900; 22 <= k(s)(+) <= 155; and 28 <= delta(+)(99)/ k(s)(+) <= 199). For the rough-wall measurements, the mean all shear stress is determined using a floating element drag balance. All smooth- and rough-wall data exhibit, over an inertial sublayer, regions of logarithmic dependence in the mean velocity and streamwise velocity variance. These logarithmic slopes are apparently the same between smooth and rough walls, indicating similar dynamics are present in this region. The streamwise mean velocity defect and skewness profiles each show convincing collapse in the outer region of the flow, suggesting that Townsend's (The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, vol. 1, 1956, Cambridge University Press) wall-similarity hypothesis is a good approximation for these statistics even at these finite friction Reynolds numbers. Outer-layer collapse is also observed in the rough-wall streamwise velocity variance, but only for flows with delta(+)(99) greater than or similar to 14000. At Reynolds numbers lower than this, profile invariance is only apparent when the flow is fully rough. In transitionally rough flows at low delta(+)(99), the outer region of the inner-normalised streamwise velocity variance indicates a dependence on k(s)(+) for the present rough surface.