期刊
HEALTH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/13634593221109682
关键词
case study; credibility; grounded theory; member checking; qualitative research
资金
- Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion] [BES2017-079911]
- Spanish Ministry of Universities [Ministerio de Universidades]
- Next Generation European Union funds
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad] [CSO201677257-P]
This study examined the implementation of member checking in different socioeconomic neighborhoods and found that attendees played an active role in co-constructing research findings, but there were also potential side effects. Researchers need to conduct further research to advance knowledge about member checking.
Although member checking is a well-established strategy for appraising credibility, there is a lack of research reporting procedures and outcomes when using this strategy. In recent years, scholars have implemented new member checking strategies along with several epistemological stances. In this work, researchers conducted member checking in three neighbourhoods with different socioeconomic status in Madrid, Spain. Attendance at member checking meetings was lower than expected. Member checking meetings were conducted in public halls within each neighbourhood and lasted approximately 2 hours. During the first hour, researchers introduced the aim of the meetings and shared summarized research findings with attendees using a slideshow. During the second hour, attendees had the opportunity to comment on any aspect of the research. Researchers used grounded theory coding strategies and a constructivist approach informed the analysis of the transcribed member checking meetings. One core category emerged, and it was named 'Co-constructing findings and side effects of the interaction between researchers and participants in member checking'. Member checking attendees contributed to co-constructing findings by means of underscore and disagreement. It is possible that these meetings might have caused side effects such as unintended comparisons between neighbourhoods and negative health-related behaviours. Attendees wondered how the findings could improve their neighbourhoods. The meetings allowed interaction between participants and researchers and resulted in appraising and co-constructing qualitative research findings. More research is needed to advance knowledge about member checking.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据