4.2 Article

Do Smart Cities Technologies Contribute to Revenue Performance? Evidence from US Local Governments

期刊

PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 1155-1180

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2022.2076248

关键词

digita-era governance (DEG); government performance; ICTs; revenue performance; smart cities technologies (SCT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the effects of smart cities technologies (SCT) on government revenue performance and finds that higher engagement with SCT contributes to improved government revenue. SCT contribute to local retail trade revenue and revenue of healthcare and social assistance establishments in a local government area.
There is an increasing trend among local governments in the United States and elsewhere in the world to adopt smart cities technologies (SCT), but the question remains: Do these technologies contribute to government revenue performance? Drawing on the digital-era governance (DEG) literature for theoretical context, this article investigates the effects of commitment to, engagement with, and barriers encountered with SCT on government revenue performance. The effects are examined using performance data obtained from the 2016 International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Smart Cities Survey and the U.S. Census Bureau. The ordinary least squares (OLS) regression results provide empirical support to the assertion that higher engagement with SCT contributes to government revenue performance. Overall, we find that SCT contribute to local retail trade revenue collection efforts and health care and social assistance revenue of establishments in a local government area. The article offers policy implications on how local governments can improve their revenue performance using SCT that contribute to important public values such as timeliness, productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, and government competitiveness, as well as benevolence and human dignity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据