4.5 Article

Bayesian quantile forecasting via the realized hysteretic GARCH model

期刊

JOURNAL OF FORECASTING
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 1317-1337

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/for.2876

关键词

expected shortfall; hysteretic GARCH model; Markov chain Monte Carlo method; realized volatility; threshold GARCH model; value at risk

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST109-2118-M-029-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research introduces a new model, the realized hysteretic GARCH, which incorporates delayed mean and volatility switching based on a hysteresis variable. The Bayesian MCMC procedure is employed to estimate model parameters and forecast volatility, VaR, and ES. Simulation and empirical results demonstrate the superior performance of the realized hysteretic GARCH model as a quantile forecasting tool.
This research introduces a new model, a realized hysteretic GARCH, that is similar to a three-regime nonlinear framework combined with daily returns and realized volatility. The setup allows the mean and volatility switching in a regime to be delayed when the hysteresis variable lies in a hysteresis zone. This nonlinear model presents explosive persistence and high volatility in Regime 1 in order to capture extreme cases. We employ the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure to estimate model parameters and to forecast volatility, value at risk (VaR), and expected shortfall (ES). A simulation study highlights the properties of the proposed MCMC methods, as well as their accuracy and satisfactory performance as quantile forecasting tools. We also consider two competing models, the realized GARCH and the realized threshold GARCH, for comparison and carry out Bayesian risk forecasting via predictive distributions on four stock markets. The out-of-sample period covers the recent 4 years by a rolling window approach and includes the COVID-19 pandemic period. Among the realized models, the realized hysteretic GARCH model outperforms at the 1% level in terms of violation rates and backtests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据