4.5 Article

Enhancing the analysis of online product reviews to support product improvement: integrating text mining with quality function deployment

期刊

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2021-0143

关键词

Customer requirements; Online product reviews; QFD; Voice of the customer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an automated approach to quality management and product improvement using online product reviews. By performing text mining, it effectively captures the voice of the customer and utilizes the extracted information to guide the product improvement process. This approach enhances quality management processes in organizations and advances customer-oriented product improvement.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an effective approach to support and guide production improvement processes utilising online product reviews. Design/methodology/approach This paper combines two methods: (1) natural language processing (NLP) to support advanced text mining to increase the accuracy of information extracted from product reviews and (2) quality function deployment (QFD) to utilise the extracted information to guide the product improvement process. Findings The paper proposes an approach to automate the process of obtaining voice of the customer (VOC) by performing text mining on available online product reviews while considering key factors such as the time of review and review usefulness. The paper enhances quality management processes in organisations and advances the literature on customer-oriented product improvement processes. Originality/value Online product reviews are a valuable source of information for companies to capture the true VOC. VOC is then commonly used by companies as the main input for QFD to enhance quality management and product improvement. However, this process requires considerable time, during which VOC may change, which may negatively impact the output of QFD. This paper addresses this challenge by providing an improved approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据