4.1 Article

Understanding interpersonal guilt: Associations with attachment, altruism, and personality pathology

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 573-580

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12854

关键词

control-mastery theory; guilt; attachment; altruism; personality pathology

资金

  1. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research [18317]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationships among interpersonal guilt, attachment, altruism, and personality pathology. The results showed that self-hate had the strongest association with personality dysfunction. These findings provide a foundation for further research on interpersonal guilt and relational functioning.
The aim of this article is to empirically investigate the relationships among interpersonal guilt, as conceived within control-mastery theory (CMT), and attachment, altruism, and personality pathology in an English-speaking sample. An online sample of 393 participants was recruited to complete the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale self-report version-15 (IGRS-15s), together with other empirically validated measures for the assessment of attachment, altruism, and personality pathology. On the basis of previous studies conducted in Italian-speaking samples, we hypothesized that survivor guilt, separation/disloyalty guilt, and omnipotent responsibility guilt would be associated with attachment anxiety and avoidance, altruism, and personality pathology; self-hate was hypothesized to be associated only with attachment anxiety and avoidance and personality pathology. Analyses examined bivariate associations as well as the network of partial correlations among variables. The results largely confirmed hypothesized associations, with self-hate evincing the strongest unique association with personality dysfunction. Findings provide a basis for further research regarding interpersonal guilt and personality and relational functioning, with potential implications for clinical conceptualizations of the role of guilt in psychopathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据