3.9 Article

Geographical structure of the local segregation of migrants in (sub)urban China

期刊

GEOJOURNAL
卷 88, 期 2, 页码 1449-1467

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-022-10693-6

关键词

Segregation; Migrant; Less developed cities; Suburb; Urban redevelopment; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unprecedented urbanization in China has led to the concentration of rural migrants in suburban areas rather than city centers. This study finds that migrant segregation increased between 2000 and 2010, primarily in the suburbs. Surprisingly, economically less developed municipalities tend to have higher levels of segregation.
Unprecedented urbanisation in China has profoundly reshaped the country's social-spatial structure. Owing to economic suburbanisation and urban redevelopment processes, migrants coming from rural areas are increasingly concentrated in suburbs rather than city centres. Against this backdrop, this paper focuses on residential segregation between migrants and locals, and on geographical (re)structuring between the city centre and suburb. Theil's H Index is used to disaggregate the migrant segregation of each municipality into a within-suburb, a within-centre and a between-centre-suburb component. We use Census data for 258 municipalities in 2000 and 2010; we find that migrant segregation increased in this period. We ascribe this to the increasing segregation of migrants in suburban areas, which offsets the increasingly balanced distribution of migrants between the city centre and suburb. Segregation in city centres also increased slightly in this period. Unexpectedly, less economically developed municipalities, defined by their per capita GDP, tend to be more segregated than their more developed counterparts. Less developed municipalities also have a higher level of suburban employment and housing opportunities in the whole municipality, but feature more segregated suburban spaces and a polarised distribution of migrants between the centre and suburb.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据