4.2 Article

Secondary school students' familiarity with animals and plants: hometown size matters

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 1564-1583

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2022.2086689

关键词

Biodiversity education; interest in nature; wildlife species; plant blindness

资金

  1. Basque Government through the Science, Technology and Mathematics Education Research Group (STEMERG) [IT1349-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assesses the ability of secondary students to list wild animals and plants and finds that students have more knowledge about exotic and domesticated species. Additionally, smaller hometowns are associated with a higher listing of wild native species, although there are still symptoms of "Plant Awareness Disparity" present.
Species literacy is an important aspect of biodiversity education. This study assesses the ability of secondary students (12/13 years old; n = 944) to list wild animals and plants and aims to determine whether this is linked with their interest in nature, their preferences towards animals and plants and different groups therein, the school type (public or private), per capita income and the size of the students' hometowns. We have observed that students claim to have a very high interest in nature, but they spontaneously recall a worrisome proportion of exotic species (especially animals), as well as domesticated ones (mainly plants). Besides, they present several 'Plant Awareness Disparity' (PAD) symptoms. However, the smaller their hometown is, the more wild native species they list, especially animals, although most PAD symptoms prevail in their answers. Our findings suggest that citizens living in more rural environments may have a higher contact with nature, resulting on a higher spontaneous listing of wild native species. Nevertheless, special efforts must be conducted to counteract PAD as well as 'Native Species Awareness Disparity' wherever they live.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据