4.6 Review

The effect of transport infrastructure, congestion and reliability on mental wellbeing: a systematic review of empirical studies

期刊

TRANSPORT REVIEWS
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 264-302

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2022.2100943

关键词

Congestion; transport delays; transport reliability; transport infrastructure; mental health; wellbeing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the influence of transport infrastructure and operational performance on mental health. The findings suggest that key transport infrastructure, congestion, and delay indicators have a negative impact on emotional states and psychological well-being. However, there is limited research on the effect of transport reliability, indicating a need for further investigation.
There has been a growing interest in understanding the interdependencies between urbanisation and mental health. Although transportation in cities is complex and of foremost importance to support the mobility of goods and passengers, little is known about how it relates to individual psychological distress. This review aims to provide an up-to-date synthesis of research evidence about the influence of transport infrastructure and operational performance (congestion, delays and reliability) on mental health/wellbeing. It is structured around three main interacting concepts that determined the search/selection of articles: identification of the above-mentioned transport-related exposures; use of psychological and physiological validated instruments; and the outcome on mental health/wellbeing. Ultimately, 69 studies were identified involving an empirical quantitative focus that met the inclusion criteria. We summarise the instruments most reported in these studies and the findings linking transport indicators and psychological and physiological outcomes. Across the review, we identified evidence of the contribution of key transport infrastructure, congestion and delay indicators on negative affective states and psychophysiological distress. Regarding transport reliability, the scarce number of studies identified did not allow for drawing similar firm conclusions. We conclude by discussing some limitations and providing recommendations for future research and policy-making agendas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据