4.6 Article

Differences in fall-related emergency departments visits with and without an Injury, 2018

期刊

JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 367-370

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.07.002

关键词

Elderly; Fall injuries; Falls; ICD-10-CM; Older adults

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Falls have a significant impact on the health of older adults, with the majority of fall-related emergency department visits resulting in injuries. Females and older adults in rural areas have a higher percentage of fall-related injuries. Emergency department visits without a coded injury are more likely to result in hospitalization compared to visits with a coded injury.
Background: Falls, with or without an injury, often affect the health of older adults (65+). Methods: We used the 2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to describe older adults' fall-related ED visits. We defined fall-related ED visits as those with a fall external cause of morbidity code and fall-injury related ED visits as those with an injury diagnosis code and a fall external cause of morbidity code. Percentages of fall-related and fall-injury related ED visits were analyzed by select characteristics. Results: Over 86% of fall-related ED visits were fall-injury related. A higher percentage of females (87%) and rural (88%) older adults' fall-related ED visits were fall-injury related compared to males (85%) and urban older adults (86%). A higher percentage of fall-related ED visits without a coded injury (33%) were hospitalized compared to those with a coded injury (29%). Conclusion: The majority of fall -related ED visits included an injury diagnosis. Practical applications: Researchers can consider which method of measuring ED visits related to falls is most appropriate for their study. Limiting fall-related ED visits to only those where an injury diagnosis is also present may underestimate the number of fall-related ED visits but may be appropriate for researchers specifically interested in fall injuries. (c) 2022 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据