4.2 Review

Substance-Related Cross-Commodity Purchase Tasks: A Systematic Review

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 72-86

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000851

关键词

behavioral economics; demand; purchase task; cross-price elasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this systematic review, cross-commodity purchase task studies with human participants were examined. The findings revealed that tobacco and nicotine products were the most frequently assessed drug category. The most consistent economic relationships observed were the substitution of traditional cigarettes by e-cigarettes and e-liquid, and both legal and illegal cannabis for other drugs. The implications of these results in terms of treatment and harm reduction were discussed, and recommendations for future research were provided.
Objective: In the context of behavioral economics, drug use is a choice to which an individual may allocate responding despite the presence of alternative response possibilities. To examine the demand for a drug in an environment in which other drugs or nondrug alternatives are present, researchers often use a cross-commodity purchase task. These tasks allow participants to make choices across several reinforcers at varied unit prices and may elucidate behavioral economic patterns of substitutability and complementarity. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of cross-commodity purchase task studies with human participants. Method: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we screened 46 full-text studies (from 456 total records obtained from PsycINFO and PubMed databases and reference list search), yielding a final sample of 35 studies. Results: The drug category with the largest number of studies assessed was tobacco and nicotine products. The most consistent economic relationships found were substitutability of traditional cigarettes by e-cigarettes and e-liquid, and both legal and illegal cannabis for the other; however, other substitutable and complementary relationships were observed (e.g., substitution of food for cigarettes, a complementary relationship between alcohol and cannabis). Conclusions: We discuss the implications of the results of this review from a treatment and harm reduction standpoint, highlight areas for future research particularly among drug categories with few studies and evaluating ecological validity of hypothetical measures, and make best practice recommendations for future cross-commodity drug-related purchase task research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据