4.7 Article

An economic framework for producing critical minerals as joint products

期刊

RESOURCES POLICY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102753

关键词

Ore; Returns to scale; Geological input; Mineral recovery; Mineral policy; USGS; Rare earth elements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a two-stage optimization model to explore the economics of critical minerals. The results suggest that expanding the production of critical minerals can be achieved by investing in efficient technologies and technologies with increasing returns to scale. However, mandating firms to process a certain percentage of geological input for critical mineral recovery would have unintended consequences of increasing the marginal cost of producing main minerals. The supply elasticity of critical minerals depends on the returns to scale of production.
The topic of economics of critical minerals production has received little attention in the economics literature. This study presents a two-stage optimization model to frame the economics of critical minerals. In the first stage, firms minimize cost to choose input levels, including the extraction of a common ore to produce a critical mineral with or after the production of a main mineral. We examine the impact of geological, cost, and technology parameters on the level of input use and the decision to further process for critical minerals. We characterize the marginal cost of producing critical minerals, which is used in the second stage to determine production decisions. Results suggest that (1) production of critical minerals could be expanded by investing in technically efficient technologies and technologies with increasing returns to scale, (2) prescriptive mandates requiring firms to process a given percentage of geological input to recover critical minerals would have unintended consequences such as increasing the marginal cost of producing main minerals, and (3) the supply elasticity of critical minerals depends on returns to scale of production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据