4.4 Article

A Crash Course in Good and Bad Controls

期刊

SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00491241221099552

关键词

causal inference; bad controls; back-door criterion; DAG; regression

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS-2106908]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-S-12091, N0001421-1-2351]
  3. Toyota Research Institute of North America [PO000897]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces graphical tools for addressing the problem of bad control and aims to make these tools accessible to a broader community of scientists concerned with the causal interpretation of regression models.
Many students of statistics and econometrics express frustration with the way a problem known as bad control is treated in the traditional literature. The issue arises when the addition of a variable to a regression equation produces an unintended discrepancy between the regression coefficient and the effect that the coefficient is intended to represent. Avoiding such discrepancies presents a challenge to all analysts in the data intensive sciences. This note describes graphical tools for understanding, visualizing, and resolving the problem through a series of illustrative examples. By making this crash course accessible to instructors and practitioners, we hope to avail these tools to a broader community of scientists concerned with the causal interpretation of regression models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据