4.5 Article

Engagement in vice food and beverage consumption: The role of perceived lack of control

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 2221-2239

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21708

关键词

engagement; lack of control; self-indulgence; stress; vice food and beverage consumption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to fill the gap in prior research by examining the exact link between perceptions of control, stress, and unhealthy food choices. The results support the prediction that a perceived lack of control increases the consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages due to higher personal stress and a need to escape through self-indulgence.
Prior research has established a link between lacking control over one's life, the resulting stress, and the maladaptive outcome of eating disorders. However, such research has left unexamined the exact link among perceptions of control, stress, and unhealthy food choices. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying the exact sequence linking these variables and explaining why stress induced by low control leads to engagement in vice food consumption. Based on self-licensing theory, we predict that a perceived lack of control indirectly prompts people to engage in vice food and beverage consumption, because a lack of control leads to higher personal stress and, consequently, a need to escape through self-indulgence. Across one survey-based study in France and two experiments (in the United States and the United Kingdom), we find consistent support for our hypothesis. The results support the prediction that a perceived lack of control increases the consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages. Specifically, when consumers feel a lack of control over their life, they experience stress, seek an escape from this stress, and end up self-indulging through the consumption of vice food and beverages. For public policy-makers and brand managers, the results suggest that having people perceive more control over their life is of particular importance to staying healthy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据