4.7 Article

Just transition frames: Recognition, representation, and distribution in Irish beef farming

期刊

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 150-160

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.06.009

关键词

Just transition; Environmental justice; Issue framing; Beef farming; Climate change; Sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research explores the applicability of the just transition framework in the challenges faced by Irish beef farming. Using a novel methodological approach, the study reveals the core issues and conflicts arising from the misalignment between key actors and beef farmers. The model presented offers guidance towards a future characterized by justice and sustainability.
The concept of just transition has emerged as an important governance framework guiding sectors transitioning from unsustainable to sustainable practices and is most dominant in debates on the energy transition. This research, in contrast, explores if and how this framework can make sense of the challenges facing Irish beef farming. The sector is transforming in response to an intersecting range of social, environmental, and market pressures. Beef farmers are at the centre of this, yet little research has been conducted gathering their perspectives on the changing state of their livelihoods and their concerns for the future. Here, we use a novel methodological approach, drawing on the concept of framing as a strategic communication device to explore the perspectives of key actors in this sector and a multi-dimensional environmental justice framework to identify the elements of (in)justice present within frames. This novel just transition frames and functions model exposes how misalignment between powerful key actors, concerned with distributional matters, and beef farmers, concerned with declining social status, shifting identities, and under-representation is found to be contributing to conflict. We show how the application of this model can inform pathways to just and sustainable futures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据