4.7 Article

LRCH1 interferes with DOCK8-Cdc42-induced T cell migration and ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 214, 期 1, 页码 209-226

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20160068

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFD0500207, 2016YFC0902200, 2016YFD0500407]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB19000000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31422018, 81630043, 81571617, 81571552, 31300723, 81671572, 81301027]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, SIBCB, CAS [SKLCBKF2013003]
  5. Hundred Talents Plan in HuBei Province
  6. Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Directional autoreactive CD4(+) T cell migration into the central nervous system plays a critical role in multiple sclerosis. Recently, DOCK8 was identified as a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Cdc42 activation and has been associated with human mental retardation. Little is known about whether DOCK8 is related to multiple sclerosis (MS) and how to restrict its GEF activity. Using two screening systems, we found that LRCH1 competes with Cdc42 for interaction with DOCK8 and restrains T cell migration. In response to chemokine stimulation, PKCa phosphorylates DOCK8 at its three serine sites, promoting DOCK8 separation from LRCH1 and translocation to the leading edge to guide T cell migration. Point mutations at the DOCK8 serine sites block chemokine-and PKC alpha-induced T cell migration. Importantly, Dock8 mutant mice or Lrch1 transgenic mice were protected from MOG (35-55) peptide-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), whereas Lrch1-deficient mice displayed a more severe phenotype. Notably, DOCK8 expression was markedly increased in PBMCs from the acute phase of MS patients. Together, our study demonstrates LRCH1 as a novel effector to restrain PKC alpha-DOCK8-Cdc42 module-induced T cell migration and ameliorate EAE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据