4.7 Article

Specific niches for lung-resident memory CD8+ T cells at the site of tissue regeneration enable CD69-independent maintenance

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 213, 期 13, 页码 3057-3073

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20160938

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [24689043, 15H01268]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01HL122559]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  5. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  6. Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science
  7. Kindai University Anti-Aging Center
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05199, 16K08821, 26221305, 24689043, 15K19116, 15H01268, 16K08409, 16K08850] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD8(+) tissue-resident memory T cells (T-RM cells) reside permanently in nonlymphoid tissues and provide a first line of protection against invading pathogens. However, the precise localization of CD8(+) T-RM cells in the lung, which physiologically consists of a markedly scant interstitium compared with other mucosa, remains unclear. In this study, we show that lung CD8(+) T-RM cells localize predominantly in specific niches created at the site of regeneration after tissue injury, whereas peripheral tissue-circulating CD8(+) effector memory T cells (T-EM cells) are widely but sparsely distributed in unaffected areas. Although CD69 inhibited sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1-mediated egress of CD8(+) T cells immediately after their recruitment into lung tissues, such inhibition was not required for the retention of cells in the T-RM niches. Furthermore, despite rigid segregation of T-EM cells from the T-RM niche, prime-pull strategy with cognate antigen enabled the conversion from T-EM cells to T-RM cells by creating de novo T-RM niches. Such damage site-specific localization of CD8(+) T-RM cells may be important for efficient protection against secondary infections by respiratory pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据