4.5 Article

Predictors of bullying, depression, and suicide attempts among youth: The intersection of race/ethnicity by gender identity

期刊

CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106536

关键词

Intersectionality; Gender identity; Race; ethnicity; Bullying; Depression; Suicidal ideation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using multivariate logistic regression, this study analyzed data from the 2015 Healthy Kids Colorado Survey to explore the relationship between the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender identity with mental and behavioral health-related risks. The findings suggest that youth with multiple marginalized identities, particularly those who identify as both Bi/Multi-racial or Latino and as transgender/non-binary, have higher levels of depression and suicidal ideation compared to cisgender White youth. Intersectional approaches are important in designing risk prevention and response interventions for racial/ethnic minority youth who are also transgender/non-binary.
Using multivariate logistic regression, the current study analyzes data from the 2015 Healthy Kids Colorado Survey - a representative sample of 7,095 public high school students between the ages of 14 and 18 in Colorado - to explore the relationship between the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender identity with mental and behavioral health-related risks including depression, school bullying, online bullying, and suicidal ideation. As anticipated, we find that some health-related risks were higher among youth with multiple marginalized identities. Specifically, youth identifying both as Bi/Multi-racial or Latino and as transgender/non-binary had significantly higher levels of depression and suicidal ideation compared to cisgender White youth. Risk prevention and response interventions should use intersectional approaches responsive to the unique needs of racial/ethnic minority youth who are also transgender/non-binary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据