4.4 Editorial Material

Epistemic Oppression, Construct Validity, and Scientific Rigor: Commentary on Woo et al. (2022)

期刊

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 32-38

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17456916211072830

关键词

GRE; epistemic oppression; psychology graduate admissions; holistic review; construct validity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This commentary highlights flaws in Woo et al.'s article that undermine its credibility and utility. It discusses the exclusion of relevant research and the neglect of construct validity in a psychometric article on the GRE. The authors are urged to address the issue of anti-Black violence and murder with respect and seriousness.
In this commentary, I highlight flaws in the article by Woo and colleagues (this issue) that undermine its credibility and utility as rigorous science that contributes to the field. I do so by discussing (a) the concept of epistemic oppression regarding the glaring exclusion of multiple germane bodies of research and (b) the importance of including construct validity within a psychometric article regarding the Graduate Record Examination (GRE). I conclude with a plea to the authors that the matter of anti-Black violence and murder, which they reference, is one to be taken respectfully, seriously, and somberly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据