4.8 Article

The portfolio planning, implementing, and governing process: An inductive approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121652

关键词

Portfolio management process; Portfolio planning; Portfolio implementing; Portfolio governing; Inductive approach; Case research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study, based on qualitative research in the electrical machinery, medical device, and pharmaceutical sectors, reveals the five phases of portfolio management process and the four actors involved. It also identifies three levers that shape the portfolio management process. Implications for portfolio management studies and practices are discussed based on these findings.
Portfolio management has long been viewed as a major source of competitive differentiation in technology-intensive organizations with substantial R&D investment. Yet, little work has addressed how portfolio management unfolds. Furthermore, the extant work has largely conceptualized the portfolio management process in a deductive manner, offering limited propositions for understanding the inner workings of portfolio management in real-world settings. Drawing on an inductive, qualitative study of nine cases in the electrical machinery, medical device, and pharmaceutical sectors, our work opens the black box of portfolio planning, implementing, and controlling process in practice. We find that organizations manage portfolios through five interdependent phases (ecosystem surveillance, portfolio strategy development, business case management, portfolio decision-making, and new product/service management), with four distinct actors (corporate, top management, portfolio management, and portfolio management governance functions) being actively engaged in different phases. Our study also established three main levers that shape the portfolio management process in practice (governance, integration, and information). Based on these findings, implications for portfolio management studies and practices are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据