4.7 Article

The impact of income on household solar panel uptake: Exploring diverse results using Australian data

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106124

关键词

Aggregation; Hierarchical data; Household; Income; Non-linear; Solar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the mixed results of the impact of income on household solar-panel uptake is crucial for economic and social studies as well as policy-making. This study finds that different data samples yield different results, with an inconsistent relationship between income and solar-panel uptake. However, high-income households tend to exhibit a negative association, especially those with higher wealth. Therefore, a shift in solar policies is needed, focusing not only on income but also on wealth or dual income-wealth thresholds.
Understanding mixed results for the impact of income on household solar-panel uptake is important for several reasons. Income is often a central feature of economic studies or a key control for social studies. Furthermore, policy makers are increasingly relying on income to determine solar-subsidy eligibility. We use a large sample of Australian households to suggest reasons for mixed results. For a comparative purpose, we show a negative relationship between income and solar-panel uptake for a regression with 318 observations, where these observations are area-aggregated averages of underlying household-level survey data. A similar model with 31,828 household observations from the same household-level survey data suggests a positive relationship. This gradually disappears when adding key controls. When assessing possible non-linearity, we find a negative association between income and solar-panel uptake at high-income levels. Interestingly, this is primarily true for higher-wealth households. Our analysis suggests an important shift in solar policies is needed - from a singular focus on income toward wealth or dual income-wealth thresholds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据