4.7 Article

The impact of time pressure on impulsive buying: The moderating role of consumption type

期刊

TOURISM MANAGEMENT
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104505

关键词

Impulsive buying; Time pressure; Consumption type

资金

  1. Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China [19ZD26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research examines the impact of time pressure on impulsive buying, with the moderation of consumption type and the mediation of positive emotion. The study finds that time pressure is positively correlated with affective impulsive buying but negatively associated with cognitive impulsive buying. High time pressure increases impulsive buying for hedonic products/services, while low time pressure enhances impulsive buying for utilitarian products/services. These effects are mediated by positive emotion.
The research examines the effect of time pressure on impulsive buying via the moderation of consumption type by identifying positive emotion as the underlying mechanism. Firstly, we verify that time pressure is positively correlated with affective aspects of impulsive buying but negatively associated with cognitive aspects of impulsive buying. Notably, affective (vs. cognitive) impulsive buying is dominated by affective (vs. cognitive) information processing. Research also has shown that hedonic (vs. utilitarian) consumption is dominated by affective (vs. cognitive) information processing. We thus further illustrate that high time pressure increases impulsive buying for hedonic products/services whereas low time pressure enhances impulsive buying for utilitarian products/services. These effects are mediated by positive emotion. This research reconciles the conflicting findings of time pressure effect on impulsive buying, advances the knowledge of how time pressure impacts impulsive buying, and provides practical implications for tourism practitioners and marketers about promoting strategies of impulsive buying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据