4.7 Review

Why small fluxes matter: the case and approaches for improving measurements of photosynthesis and (photo)respiration

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 67, 期 10, 页码 3027-3039

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw139

关键词

Diffusion; internal leaf CO2; mesophyll conductance; photosynthesis; respiration; stomatal conductance; xylem CO2

资金

  1. NSF at the University of New Mexico [IOS-0719118]
  2. NSF EPSCoR Program at the University of New Mexico [IIA-1301346]
  3. NIH at the University of New Mexico [NIH-NCRR P20RR18754]
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. Office of Integrative Activities [1301346] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate measurement of small fluxes is critical for photosynthesis models. This review highlights improved methods of measuring CO2 diffusion into and within leaves, CO2 concentrations inside leaves, and CO2 efflux.Since its inception, the Farquhar et al. (1980) model of photosynthesis has been a mainstay for relating biochemistry to environmental conditions from chloroplast to global levels in terrestrial plants. Many variables could be assigned from basic enzyme kinetics, but the model also required measurements of maximum rates of photosynthetic electron transport (J (max) ), carbon assimilation (V-cmax ), conductance of CO2 into (g (s) ) and through (g (m) ) the leaf, and the rate of respiration during the day (R (d) ). This review focuses on improving the accuracy of these measurements, especially fluxes from photorespiratory CO2, CO2 in the transpiration stream, and through the leaf epidermis and cuticle. These fluxes, though small, affect the accuracy of all methods of estimating mesophyll conductance and several other photosynthetic parameters because they all require knowledge of CO2 concentrations in the intercellular spaces. This review highlights modified methods that may help to reduce some of the uncertainties. The approaches are increasingly important when leaves are stressed or when fluxes are inferred at scales larger than the leaf.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据