4.7 Article

Post-transcriptional regulation of photosynthetic genes is a key driver of C4 leaf ontogeny

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 137-146

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw386

关键词

C-4; Cleomaceae; EISA; leaf ontogeny; photosynthesis; post-transcription

资金

  1. University of Zurich
  2. Plant Fellows programme of the Zurich-Basel Plant Science Centre
  3. Clinical Trial Unit of the University of Bern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

C-4 photosynthesis allows highly efficient carbon fixation that originates from tightly regulated anatomical and biochemical modifications of leaf architecture. Recent studies showed that leaf transcriptome modifications during leaf ontogeny of closely related C-3 (Tarenaya hassleriana) and C-4 (Gynandropsis gynandra) species within the Cleomaceae family existed but they did not identify any dedicated transcriptional networks or factors specifically driving C-4 leaf ontogeny. RNAseq analysis provides a steady-state quantification of whole-cell mRNAs but does not allow any discrimination between transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes that may occur simultaneously during leaf ontogeny. Here we use exon-intron split analysis (EISA) to determine the extent to which transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes are involved in the regulation of gene expression between young and expanded leaves in both species. C-4-specific changes in post-transcriptional regulation were observed for genes involved in the Calvin-Benson cycle and some photosystem components but not for C-4 core-cycle genes. Overall, this study provides an unbiased genome-wide insight into the post-transcriptional mechanisms that regulate gene expression through the control of mRNA levels and could be central to the onset of C-4 photosynthesis. This mechanism is cytosolic which implies cell-specific modifications of mRNA stability. Understanding this mechanism may be crucial when aiming to transform C-3 crops into C-4 crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据