4.7 Article

A generalized stoichiometric model of C3, C2, C2+C4, and C4 photosynthetic metabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 269-282

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw303

关键词

Assimilation; bioengineering; carbon-concentrating mechanism; constraint; dark reactions; flux balance; flux-balance analysis; NAD-ME; NADP-ME; PEPCK

资金

  1. ERC advanced grant (CDREG) [322998]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of suppressing photorespiration in crops to maximize assimilation and yield is stimulating considerable interest among researchers looking to bioengineer carbon-concentrating mechanisms into C-3 plants. However, detailed quantification of the biochemical activities in the bundle sheath is lacking. This work presents a general stoichiometric model for C-3, C-2, C-2+C-4, and C-4 assimilation (SMA) in which energetics, metabolite traffic, and the different decarboxylating enzymes (NAD-dependent malic enzyme, NADP-dependent malic enzyme, or phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) are explicitly included. The SMA can be used to refine experimental data analysis or formulate hypothetical scenarios, and is coded in a freely available Microsoft Excel workbook. The theoretical underpinnings and general model behaviour are analysed with a range of simulations, including (i) an analysis of C-3, C-2, C-2+C-4, and C-4 in operational conditions; (ii) manipulating photorespiration in a C-3 plant; (iii) progressively upregulating a C-2 shuttle in C-3 photosynthesis; (iv) progressively upregulating a C-4 cycle in C-2 photosynthesis; and (v) manipulating processes that are hypothesized to respond to transient environmental inputs. Results quantify the functional trade-offs, such as the electron transport needed to meet ATP/NADPH demand, as well as metabolite traffic, inherent to different subtypes. The SMA refines our understanding of the stoichiometry of photosynthesis, which is of paramount importance for basic and applied research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据