4.7 Article

Determinants of patients' satisfaction and trust toward healthcare service environment in general practice clinics

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856750

关键词

satisfaction; trust; healthcare service; word-of-mouth; clinic

资金

  1. Key Planning Project of Educational Science of Jiangxi Province
  2. [17ZD059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the healthcare service environment, patients' experience, and responses to healthcare services in private general practice clinics in Malaysia. The results show that ambiance, service delivery, interior decor, and cleanliness significantly influence patients' trust and satisfaction, while exterior design does not. Patients' satisfaction and trust also have a significant impact on their repatronage intention, willingness to pay for premium healthcare services, and engagement in word-of-mouth for healthcare services.
This study aimed to examine the healthcare service environment, patients' experience, and responses toward healthcare services in private general practice (GP) clinics. Self-administered questionnaires were used for collecting data from 367 respondents with prior experience in visiting the general practice clinics in Malaysia. SmartPLS statistical tool was used to test the underlying hypotheses. The results revealed that ambiance, service delivery, interior decor, and cleanliness had a significant influence on patients' trust and satisfaction while the exterior design is neither associated with satisfaction nor trust. Patients' satisfaction and trust had a higher significant effect on their repatronage intention, willingness to pay for a premium healthcare service, and engagement in word-of-mouth for healthcare services. In practice, both the service delivery and ambiance features of the healthcare services environment might be optimized by GP clinics. This research provides significant insights from the patients' perspective toward the GP clinics' healthcare services environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据