4.7 Article

Managerial Myopia and Firm Green Innovation: Based on Text Analysis and Machine Learning

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911335

关键词

managerial myopia; green innovation; upper echelons theory; text analysis; equity incentives; institutional investors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the impact of managerial myopia on firm green innovation and constructs a managerial myopia index. Using a sample of publicly listed Chinese firms, the study finds a significant negative relationship between managerial myopia and firms' green innovation. Additionally, it reveals that equity incentives and institutional investors can mitigate the negative effect of managerial myopia on green innovation.
Green innovation plays an important role in reducing pollution and promoting sustainable development. However, not all managers, as decision-makers of enterprises, have a long-term vision to implement green innovation. The impact of managerial myopia on firm green innovation has not been examined by existing literature. Drawn on time-oriented theory in social psychology and upper echelon theory in management, this paper puts forward the relationship between managerial myopia and firm green innovation, and then constructs a managerial myopia index by text analysis and machine learning. Using a sample of publicly listed Chinese firms from 2009 to 2020, this paper finds that managerial myopia is significantly negatively associated with firms' green innovation. Every one standard deviation increase in managerial myopia makes enterprise green innovation decrease by about 1.9% standard deviation. Further analysis reveals that equity incentives and institutional investors both weaken the negative effect of managerial myopia on green innovation. This study contributes to the literature on green innovation and upper echelons theory and it also has several implications for firms' engagement in green innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据