4.3 Article

Breast Medical Oncologists' Perspectives of Telemedicine for Breast Cancer Care: A Survey Study

期刊

JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 668-E1453

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00072

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. [T32 CA009172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast clinicians generally believe that telemedicine can improve outpatient breast cancer care. Telemedicine was perceived as valuable for patient care and early-stage breast cancer follow-up. Most respondents felt that there was no difference between telemedicine and face-to-face visits in terms of patient adherence, ease of ordering tests, ease of accessing patient records, and workflow outside of the visit. However, face-to-face visits were considered better for physical examination, establishing personal connection with patients, improving overall quality of visits, and facilitating patient-physician communication.
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic forced rapid adoption of telemedicine (TM) for breast oncology visits in the United States, but the appropriate role of postpandemic TM is uncertain. We sought to understand physician and advance practice practitioner perspectives on the use of TM for outpatient breast cancer care through an electronically administered survey. METHODS: Breast medical oncology clinicians at two academic cancer centers and five satellite locations affiliated with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and the Massachusetts General Cancer Center were invited to respond to a 21-question survey administered in September 2021 about clinicians' perceptions and attitudes toward TM during the previous 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 71 survey invitations, 51 clinicians (36 physicians and 15 advance practice practitioners) provided survey responses (response rate = 72%). Ninety-two percent of respondents (n = 47) agreed that TM visits enhance patient care. Ninety-two percent of respondents (n = 46) also agreed that TM is valuable for early-stage breast cancer follow-up visits. Most respondents felt that there was no difference between TM and face-to-face (F2F) visits when it came to patient adherence, ease of ordering tests, ease of accessing patient records, and workflow outside of the visit (82%, 82%, 78%, and 53%, respectively). Fifty-one percent of respondents (n = 26) said that TM was better for timely access to follow-up appointments. Most respondents said that F2F visits were better for seeing physical problems, personal connection with patients, overall quality of visits, and patient-physician communication (100%, 75%, 65%, and 63%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Breast clinicians believe that TM is a valuable tool to enhance outpatient breast cancer care. TM was felt to be appropriate for routine follow-up visits and second opinion consultations and is as good as or better than F2F visits for several routine aspects of breast cancer care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据