4.8 Article

Porously Reduced 2-Dimensional Bi2O2CO3 Petals for Strain-Mediated Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to HCOOH

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12490

关键词

bismuth; carbon dioxide reduction; formic acid; heterointerfaces; strain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, bismuth-based catalysts were introduced for the efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid. The catalysts consisted of petal-shaped Bi2O2CO3 (BOC), which spontaneously formed from Bi thin film in aqueous carbonate solution at room temperature. The BOC petals transformed to reduced BOC (R-BOC) during the electrochemical reduction process, and the lattice mismatch between the domains induced strain at the interfaces. The R-BOC petals exhibited a superior Faradaic efficiency of 95.9% for the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to formic acid.
Here we introduce bismuth-based catalysts for the efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid (HCOOH), which are composed of petal-shaped Bi2O2CO3 (BOC) that spontaneously formed from Bi thin film in aqueous carbonate solution at room temperature. During the electrochemical reduction process, the BOC petals transform to reduced BOC (R-BOC) consisting of individual BOC and Bi domains. Lattice mismatch between both domains induces biaxial strain at the interfaces. Density functional theory calculations suggest that the tensile strain on the Bi domain stabilizes the *OCHO intermediate, reducing the thermodynamic barrier toward CO2 conversion to HCOOH. Together with the thermodynamic benefit and the unique nanoporous petal-shaped morphology, R-BOC petals have a superior Faradaic efficiency of 95.9% at -0.8 V-RHE for the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to HCOOH. This work demonstrates that the spontaneously formed binary phases with desirable lattice strain can increase the activity of bismuth catalysts to the CO2 reduction reaction; such a strategy can be applicable in design of various electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据