4.7 Article

Hierarchical Porous Polymer Coatings Based on UV-Curing for Highly Efficient Passive All-Day Radiative Cooling

期刊

ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 5746-5755

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.2c00694

关键词

hierarchical pores; intrinsic emitter; photopolymerization; phase separation; subambient cooling

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFB0406801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51522308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a fast, inexpensive, and scalable UV-curing method to fabricate porous polymer coatings with superior infrared emittance and solar reflectance, resulting in significant temperature drops during the night and under solar intensity in the metropolitan area in summer. The UV-cured coating is highly cross-linked and superhydrophobic, showing excellent durability after long-term UV irradiation, thermal aging, or immersion in corrosive chemicals.
Passive radiative cooling provides a promising way to reduce energy consumption for cooling. However, it always requires stringent materials designs or manipulations, which are neither cost-effective nor widely adaptable. Here, we report a fast, inexpensive, and scalable UV-curing method to fabricate porous polymer coatings via photopolymerization-induced phase separation. This coating with hierarchical pore structure, has a superior long-wave infrared emittance of 0.98 and strong solar reflectance of 0.96, resulting in subambient temperature drops of similar to 9.8 degrees C during the night and similar to 5.7 degrees C under solar intensity of similar to 960 W m(-2) in the metropolitan area in summer. Moreover, the UV-cured coating is highly cross-linked and superhydrophobic without any treatment, showing excellent durability after long-term UV irradiation, thermal aging, or immersion in corrosive chemicals. The paint-like simplicity and remarkable weather resistance are vital for promoting practical applications of cooling coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据