4.7 Article

Density Functional Theory Studies of Earth-Abundant Late Transition Metal-Substituted Surface plus Subsurface Iron Alloys for Selective Electrocatalytic N2 Reduction

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 11648-11655

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c02624

关键词

nitrogen reduction reaction; hydrogen evolution reaction; heterogeneous catalyst; Fe alloy catalyst; Faradaic efficiency; overpotential

资金

  1. DST-SERB [CRG/2018/001131]
  2. SPARC, New Delhi [SPARC/2018 2019/P116/SL]
  3. CSIR
  4. MHRD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the potential of late transition metal substitution on the surface, subsurface, and surface + subsurface of Fe(110) for nitrogen reduction reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction was systematically investigated using density functional theory calculations. It was found that a Ni-substituted surface + subsurface catalyst showed higher efficiency in ammonia production by suppressing the hydrogen evolution reaction.
Ammonia production from the earth-abundant feedstock of N-2 is one of the most attractive fields of research. Searching for an alternative iron-based electrocatalyst for direct ammonia synthesis is a challenging process due to the harsh reaction conditions present in the traditional route of the Haber-Bosch process. In the present work using the density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we have systematically investigated the potential of late transition metal (TM = Co, Ni, and Cu) substitution on the surface, subsurface, and surface + subsurface of Fe(110) toward the nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). We demonstrate that a Ni-substituted surface + subsurface catalyst can favor the electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis with the maximum Faradaic efficiency by suppressing the HER compared to the previously reported catalysts for ammonia production. These findings open a way in terms of designing surface + subsurface-substituted alloy catalysts for various catalytic reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据