4.5 Article

Voltage-gated calcium channels of Paramecium cilia

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 219, 期 19, 页码 3028-3038

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.141234

关键词

Paramecium; Cilia; Voltage-gated calcium channel; CaVa1; Pawn genes; Trafficking

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P20GM103449]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paramecium cells swim by beating their cilia, and make turns by transiently reversing their power stroke. Reversal is caused by Ca2+ entering the cilium through voltage-gated Ca2+ (Ca-V) channels that are found exclusively in the cilia. As ciliary Ca2+ levels return to normal, the cell pivots and swims forward in a new direction. Thus, the activation of the Ca-V channels causes cells to make a turn in their swimming paths. For 45 years, the physiological characteristics of the Paramecium ciliary Ca-V channels have been known, but the proteins were not identified until recently, when the P. tetraurelia ciliary membrane proteome was determined. Three Ca-V alpha 1 subunits that were identified among the proteins were cloned and confirmed to be expressed in the cilia. We demonstrate using RNA interference that these channels function as the ciliary Ca-V channels that are responsible for the reversal of ciliary beating. Furthermore, we show that Pawn (pw) mutants of Paramecium that cannot swim backward for lack of Ca-V channel activity do not express any of the three Ca(V)1 channels in their ciliary membrane, until they are rescued from the mutant phenotype by expression of the wild-type PW gene. These results reinforce the correlation of the three Ca-V channels with backward swimming through ciliary reversal. The PwB protein, found in endoplasmic reticulum fractions, co-immunoprecipitates with the Ca(V)1c channel and perhaps functions in trafficking. The PwA protein does not appear to have an interaction with the channel proteins but affects their appearance in the cilia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据