4.7 Article

Assessment of Seasonal Rainfall Drought Indices, Nyala City Sudan

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12071069

关键词

seasonal; drought; assessment; frequency; precipitation; drought indices; RDI; NPI; RAI; SPI

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drought is an unpredictable hydrological phenomenon, and climate change has made it difficult to predict and analyze droughts. This study investigated rainfall records of Nyala city airport metrological station from 1943 to 2017 (75 years) and used four statistical drought indices to determine the proper index. The SPI index was found to be superior in all analyses, but had some defects in detecting monthly dry droughts.
Drought is an unpredictable hydrological phenomenon, and climate change has made it difficult to predict and analyze droughts. Nyala city airport metrological station rainfall records from 1943 to 2017 (75 years) were investigated. Four statistical drought indices were used; the standardized precipitation index (SPI), the rainfall anomaly index (RAI), the rainfall decile percent index (RDI), and the percent normal precipitation index (PNI). The study analyzes, assesses, compares, and determines the proper drought index. Results show that annual normal drought class (DC4) percentages for PNI, RDI, and RAI are not significantly different at an average of 42% and 65.3% for SPI at a frequency of 49 years. In comparing the average monthly and yearly drought frequency values and considering the historical dry and wet droughts, results showed the indices performance rank as: SPI, RAI, RDI, and PNI. Result reveals that the SPI was superior in all analyses, but it had some defects in detecting monthly dry drought when precipitation is dominated by rare or zero values (start and end of the rainy season). This was concluded and revealed by conducting a zone chart showing the deviations of standard deviation about the mean. Thus, the SPI index outperforms the other three indices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据