4.6 Article

Drosophila insulator proteins exhibit in vivo liquid-liquid phase separation properties

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201536

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. College of Arts and Sciences
  2. Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mounting evidence suggests that liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) plays a crucial role in the formation and dissolution of membraneless intracellular organelles. Insulator proteins, including the cohesin subunit Rad21, are involved in the assembly of insulator bodies, which exhibit characteristics of LLPS.
Mounting evidence implicates liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), the condensation of biomolecules into liquid-like droplets in the formation and dissolution of membraneless intracellular organelles (MLOs). Cells use MLOs or condensates for various biological processes, including emergency signaling and spatiotemporal control over steady-state biochemical reactions and heterochromatin formation. Insulator proteins are architectural elements involved in establishing independent domains of transcriptional activity within eukaryotic genomes. In Drosophila, insulator proteins form nuclear foci known as insulator bodies in response to osmotic stress. However, the mechanism through which insulator proteins assemble into bodies is yet to be investigated. Here, we identify signatures of LLPS by insulator bodies, including high disorder tendency in insulator proteins, scaffold-client-dependent assembly, extensive fusion behavior, sphericity, and sensitivity to 1,6-hexanediol. We also show that the cohesin subunit Rad21 is a component of insulator bodies, adding to the known insulator protein constituents and gamma H2Av. Our data suggest a concerted role of cohesin and insulator proteins in insulator body formation and under physiological conditions. We propose a mechanism wherebythese architectural proteins modulate 3D genome organization through LLPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据