4.5 Article

Decreased force enhancement in skeletal muscle sarcomeres with a deletion in titin

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 219, 期 9, 页码 1311-1316

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.132027

关键词

Myofibrils; Eccentric contractions; Stiffness; Muscular dystrophy with myositis; Cross-bridges

类别

资金

  1. Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Canada Research Chairs Program
  5. Killam Trusts
  6. National Science Foundation [IOS-1025806, IIP-1237878]
  7. W.M. Keck Foundation
  8. Northern Arizona University Technology Research Initiative Fund
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1456868] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the cross-bridge theory, contractile force is produced by cross-bridges that form between actin and myosin filaments. However, when a contracting muscle is stretched, its active force vastly exceeds the force that can be attributed to cross-bridges. This unexplained, enhanced force has been thought to originate in the giant protein titin, which becomes stiffer in actively compared with passively stretched sarcomeres by an unknown mechanism. We investigated this mechanism using a genetic mutation (mdm) with a small but crucial deletion in the titin protein. Myofibrils from normal and mdm mice were stretched from sarcomere lengths of 2.5 to 6.0 mu m. Actively stretched myofibrils from normal mice were stiffer and generated more force than passively stretched myofibrils at all sarcomere lengths. No increase in stiffness and just a small increase in force were observed in actively compared with passively stretched mdm myofibrils. These results are in agreement with the idea that titin force enhancement stiffens and stabilizes the sarcomere during contraction and that this mechanism is lost with the mdm mutation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据