4.7 Article

Evaluation of Work-Related Personal Exposure to Aerosol Particles

期刊

TOXICS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10070405

关键词

aerosol particles; traffic emissions; PM exposure; deposition dose

资金

  1. Research Council of Lithuania [S-MIP-20-28]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of air pollution on the general public have gained attention, with significant differences in exposure levels between car cabins and modern offices. Exposure during driving is about 1/14th of that in an office, with higher PM concentrations in vehicles.
The effects of air pollution on the general public received much attention recently. Personal exposure and deposition fraction of aerosol particles were studied in Vilnius, Lithuania, focusing on individuals working in an office and driving to work. Aerosol monitoring in the urban background was found to give an indication of the minimum concentrations of particulate matter (PM) expected at urban roads, as these correspond to the lowest PM concentrations measured there. In March 2021, PM2.5 concentrations at the urban background monitoring station reached values above the annual limit of 5 mu g/m(3) the World Health Organization in 50% of cases. Our study shows significant differences in exposure to air pollution in a car cabin and in a modern office. According to the multiple-path particle dosimetry model, the exposure of the person in the office is about 14 times lower than driving a car, where the minute deposition dose for PM1 is 0.072 mu g/min for the period when the PM2.5 concentration in the urban background reaches 10 mu g/m(3). Compared to the PM2.5 mass concentration at the urban background station, the mean PM2.5 concentration in the vehicle reaches values that are 2-3 times higher. During the working day, when driving takes less than 10% of the time considered (commuting plus working), PM exposure during driving accounts for about 80% of the PM exposure caused by PM concentration in the office.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据